<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cinelerra breezy and dapper and optimizations flags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/</link>
	<description>In pursuit of The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:07:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatKiller</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>CatKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Similarly, my Athlon Tbird throws up an illegal instruction with either the 686 or athlonxp builds on Breezy. Could you build just a straight 386 for those of us with processors other than the ones you&#039;ve chosen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly, my Athlon Tbird throws up an illegal instruction with either the 686 or athlonxp builds on Breezy. Could you build just a straight 386 for those of us with processors other than the ones you&#8217;ve chosen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antoniorc</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>antoniorc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve test build for Dapper but when I play some file movie and press stop, Cinelerra freeze.

I test raw1384 dv and xvid encoded files.

Someone have the same experience? Some solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve test build for Dapper but when I play some file movie and press stop, Cinelerra freeze.</p>
<p>I test raw1384 dv and xvid encoded files.</p>
<p>Someone have the same experience? Some solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Betschart</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Betschart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I forgot to mention the error message: invalid opcode. Just right after starting the program and only visible, if started from a command line. No splash screen is visible. This occurs under breezy.
There was a release that worked around March or April, but I dont know the exact version number at the moment and I am not in the near of the system. After that, each new release shows invalid opcode, both athlon-xp and i686.
On another system I use the athlon-xp package without a problem. It is an AMD Athlon 64.
I assume the flag -march athlon-xp makes the code not runnable under an AMD Duron. I think it has no SSE. Perhaps I will try to compile without -march, but with -mtune K6-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I forgot to mention the error message: invalid opcode. Just right after starting the program and only visible, if started from a command line. No splash screen is visible. This occurs under breezy.<br />
There was a release that worked around March or April, but I dont know the exact version number at the moment and I am not in the near of the system. After that, each new release shows invalid opcode, both athlon-xp and i686.<br />
On another system I use the athlon-xp package without a problem. It is an AMD Athlon 64.<br />
I assume the flag -march athlon-xp makes the code not runnable under an AMD Duron. I think it has no SSE. Perhaps I will try to compile without -march, but with -mtune K6-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jure Cuhalev</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jure Cuhalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-159</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by &quot;does not work&quot;? Which distribution (dapper or breezy)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by &#8220;does not work&#8221;? Which distribution (dapper or breezy)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Betschart</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Betschart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-157</guid>
		<description>The build for Athlon XP does not work on an AMD Duron (an early Athlon with fewer cache on its die). I tried the build for for i686, but this also does not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The build for Athlon XP does not work on an AMD Duron (an early Athlon with fewer cache on its die). I tried the build for for i686, but this also does not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jure Cuhalev</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jure Cuhalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-156</guid>
		<description>yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Hi Gandalf

For a Core Duo processor (on a dapper machine) I should use the pentium4 package?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gandalf</p>
<p>For a Core Duo processor (on a dapper machine) I should use the pentium4 package?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jure Cuhalev</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jure Cuhalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I think I fixed it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I fixed it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wladimir Mutel</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Mutel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Dear author,

    After we had blindly followed your instructions at
    http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/ubuntu/README,
    we got the following problem :

$ sudo aptitude install cinelerra
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!
Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
    cinelerra: Depends: libavc1394-0 (&gt;= 0.5.2) but 0.5.0-2 is installed.
               Depends: libiec61883-0 (&gt;= 1.1.0+svn67) but it is not
installable
               Depends: libraw1394-8 (&gt;= 1.2.0+svn160) but 1.2.0-0.2 is to
be installed.

    Could you please direct us on where we could get this
libiec61883...(...svn67).
    It seems to be really missing. Some people ask about it in the Internet
    but never get a convenient answer. Hope you would clarify the situation.
    Thank you in advance for your reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear author,</p>
<p>    After we had blindly followed your instructions at<br />
    <a href="http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/ubuntu/README" rel="nofollow">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/ubuntu/README</a>,<br />
    we got the following problem :</p>
<p>$ sudo aptitude install cinelerra<br />
Reading package lists&#8230; Done<br />
Building dependency tree&#8230; Done<br />
Reading extended state information<br />
Initializing package states&#8230; Done<br />
Reading task descriptions&#8230; Done<br />
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.<br />
E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed<br />
E: Unable to resolve some dependencies!<br />
Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have<br />
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable<br />
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created<br />
or been moved out of Incoming.<br />
The following packages have unmet dependencies:<br />
    cinelerra: Depends: libavc1394-0 (&gt;= 0.5.2) but 0.5.0-2 is installed.<br />
               Depends: libiec61883-0 (&gt;= 1.1.0+svn67) but it is not<br />
installable<br />
               Depends: libraw1394-8 (&gt;= 1.2.0+svn160) but 1.2.0-0.2 is to<br />
be installed.</p>
<p>    Could you please direct us on where we could get this<br />
libiec61883&#8230;(&#8230;svn67).<br />
    It seems to be really missing. Some people ask about it in the Internet<br />
    but never get a convenient answer. Hope you would clarify the situation.<br />
    Thank you in advance for your reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uros</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2006/06/11/cinelerra-breezy-and-dapper-and-optimizations-flags/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Uros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiberpipa.org/~gandalf/blog/?p=48#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Nice work.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work.. <img src='http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.jurecuhalev.com @ 2012-02-12 22:50:34 by W3 Total Cache -->
