<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True meaning of Slashdot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/11/28/true-meaning-of-slashdot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/11/28/true-meaning-of-slashdot/</link>
	<description>In pursuit of The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:07:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/11/28/true-meaning-of-slashdot/comment-page-1/#comment-17497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=583#comment-17497</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To casual observer it might seem that it’s just pieces of random stories that are badly written, often with extreme pro-linux bias and no serious editorial policy. To which long time users would reply: that’s all true, but that’s not the point of /.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yes, that is exactly the point of slashdot! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where else can I blast like-minded anti-social geeks because they don&#039;t conform to my ideal standard of geekdom (namely myself) due to them not agreeing that the tool I use to enter arbitrary text is a manna-giving gift from God that angels sing for every time I hit a key and the tool they use isn&#039;t worth the magnetic fluctuations on their oldest harddrive platter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m naturally talking about GNU Emacs vs Xemacs. Now get off my lawn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To casual observer it might seem that it’s just pieces of random stories that are badly written, often with extreme pro-linux bias and no serious editorial policy. To which long time users would reply: that’s all true, but that’s not the point of /.</i></p>
<p>But yes, that is exactly the point of slashdot! </p>
<p>Where else can I blast like-minded anti-social geeks because they don&#39;t conform to my ideal standard of geekdom (namely myself) due to them not agreeing that the tool I use to enter arbitrary text is a manna-giving gift from God that angels sing for every time I hit a key and the tool they use isn&#39;t worth the magnetic fluctuations on their oldest harddrive platter?</p>
<p>I&#39;m naturally talking about GNU Emacs vs Xemacs. Now get off my lawn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swizec</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2008/11/28/true-meaning-of-slashdot/comment-page-1/#comment-17463</link>
		<dc:creator>Swizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=583#comment-17463</guid>
		<description>Ah, the good old slashdot paradox. Sites get slashdotted even though no slashdotter will ever read more than half the summary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the good old slashdot paradox. Sites get slashdotted even though no slashdotter will ever read more than half the summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.jurecuhalev.com @ 2012-02-12 21:33:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
