<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS X tray icon overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/</link>
	<description>In pursuit of The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:07:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swizec</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-23125</link>
		<dc:creator>Swizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=1368#comment-23125</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s bloody overkill! I&#039;ve got half that and think it&#039;s a dash too much. Think I&#039;ll soon tell everything I don&#039;t need the icon of (like growl and quicksivler) to just not display it. All it does is take up space and I know they&#039;re running anyway.

In fact, I&#039;ll go do just that right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s bloody overkill! I&#8217;ve got half that and think it&#8217;s a dash too much. Think I&#8217;ll soon tell everything I don&#8217;t need the icon of (like growl and quicksivler) to just not display it. All it does is take up space and I know they&#8217;re running anyway.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;ll go do just that right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Buranen</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-23120</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Buranen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=1368#comment-23120</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing istat menu!  How do you quickly get your ip or find out what processes are using rescources quickly without it?

http://www.islayer.com/apps/istatmenus/

That&#039;s right, Slayer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing istat menu!  How do you quickly get your ip or find out what processes are using rescources quickly without it?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.islayer.com/apps/istatmenus/" rel="nofollow">http://www.islayer.com/apps/istatmenus/</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, Slayer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primož Verdnik</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-23118</link>
		<dc:creator>Primož Verdnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=1368#comment-23118</guid>
		<description>You can sort the tray icon usage into the following categories: 
  - some serve as shortcuts to frequent actions (e.g. switch keyboard layout)
  - some icons serve as monitoring tools, all you ever do is look at them (e.g. CPU meters)
  - some serve as notifying tools (e.g. you have a new message!)
  - some serve as means for minimizing the application that runs in the &quot;background&quot; and just letting the user know - hey i&#039;m still around!
Some apps, of course use combinations of the four.

My thoughts are: Obviously the tray can be a useful thing, but can quickly turn into an overcrowded bar (pun!), which defeats its purpose - accessibility. You can pretty much say the same for other app containers: the task bar (dock bar), the desktop itself. But those two at least let me organize my workplace the way I see fit. Do I need stuff to be accessible? Yes. Does it need to be constantly in my face? No. 
Just let me decide where I want my app and how I want to access it, and make it easy to change my mind.
Sounds simple, but i&#039;m sure it&#039;s a very tough UI challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can sort the tray icon usage into the following categories:<br />
  &#8211; some serve as shortcuts to frequent actions (e.g. switch keyboard layout)<br />
  &#8211; some icons serve as monitoring tools, all you ever do is look at them (e.g. CPU meters)<br />
  &#8211; some serve as notifying tools (e.g. you have a new message!)<br />
  &#8211; some serve as means for minimizing the application that runs in the &#8220;background&#8221; and just letting the user know &#8211; hey i&#8217;m still around!<br />
Some apps, of course use combinations of the four.</p>
<p>My thoughts are: Obviously the tray can be a useful thing, but can quickly turn into an overcrowded bar (pun!), which defeats its purpose &#8211; accessibility. You can pretty much say the same for other app containers: the task bar (dock bar), the desktop itself. But those two at least let me organize my workplace the way I see fit. Do I need stuff to be accessible? Yes. Does it need to be constantly in my face? No.<br />
Just let me decide where I want my app and how I want to access it, and make it easy to change my mind.<br />
Sounds simple, but i&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a very tough UI challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Škudnik</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-23116</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Škudnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=1368#comment-23116</guid>
		<description>It gets worse. Put in there a CPU and/or RAM and/or bandwidth monitor and that thing has so much stuff in that you can never possibly access all of them - maybe if you switch to Finder but I sometimes see funny new icons up there when I start an application that only has few items in menu bar - makes you live under constant assumption of &quot;there be dragons&quot; ;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets worse. Put in there a CPU and/or RAM and/or bandwidth monitor and that thing has so much stuff in that you can never possibly access all of them &#8211; maybe if you switch to Finder but I sometimes see funny new icons up there when I start an application that only has few items in menu bar &#8211; makes you live under constant assumption of &#8220;there be dragons&#8221; ;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/2010/01/09/os-x-tray-icon-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-23115</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jurecuhalev.com/blog/?p=1368#comment-23115</guid>
		<description>I hate system tray icons. Really loath them. In mine, all I have are Spotlight, fast-user-switch, the time, language select (to switch between UK English and Unicode entry), battery mater, wifi, bluetooth, dial-up (for my 3G connection), SSHKeychain and ExpanDrive.

I saw a to-do list app on one of the Mac blogs recently that included in their sales patter that unlike other apps it uses the system tray rather than &quot;cluttering up your dock&quot;. So, it puts itself in an area of the screen that cannot dynamically resize itself, or be resized by the user, or hidden away, or cannot be accessed by keyboard - and that&#039;s considered a benefit? Not in my book.

I&#039;m constantly looking for ways to offload stuff from the system tray either to the dock or to the Dashboard.

The OS X system tray sucks a lot less than the Windows system tray - but that&#039;s only because it&#039;s had less time to get filled up with clutter, and most of the contents follow the clean black-and-white design of the original system tray icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate system tray icons. Really loath them. In mine, all I have are Spotlight, fast-user-switch, the time, language select (to switch between UK English and Unicode entry), battery mater, wifi, bluetooth, dial-up (for my 3G connection), SSHKeychain and ExpanDrive.</p>
<p>I saw a to-do list app on one of the Mac blogs recently that included in their sales patter that unlike other apps it uses the system tray rather than &#8220;cluttering up your dock&#8221;. So, it puts itself in an area of the screen that cannot dynamically resize itself, or be resized by the user, or hidden away, or cannot be accessed by keyboard &#8211; and that&#8217;s considered a benefit? Not in my book.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m constantly looking for ways to offload stuff from the system tray either to the dock or to the Dashboard.</p>
<p>The OS X system tray sucks a lot less than the Windows system tray &#8211; but that&#8217;s only because it&#8217;s had less time to get filled up with clutter, and most of the contents follow the clean black-and-white design of the original system tray icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.jurecuhalev.com @ 2012-02-12 21:31:32 by W3 Total Cache -->
